Sunday, December 31, 2006

New Year's, New Jeers

That annual day has arrived where people allow themselves the pleasure of watching Dick Clark bike toward death and the disappointment of watching so many people gather in New York City without a natural disaster neutralizing them. Many publications that attempt snark claim that it is a time for resolutions, but they do not need them because they are perfect. The Gource has given this the thought it deserves (almost none) and realized that there is definitely no perfection to be found outside this blog, so it well-behooves us all to make resolutions. Here, then, is an enumerated list of The Gource's resolutions:
  1. Grouse More, More
  2. More Personal Attacks - Many peopls have been getting by this year with a Gource Warning. No longer. The Gource is instituting a "no-tolerance" policy toward any and all untoward behavior. Watch your ass, Ray Billingsley.
  3. None.
It is not unreasonable to stop here. In fact, it is clearly wise. You, reader, can look forward to much more of the same Gource you've come to expect, appreciate, and trust in this past Galendar Year.

Monday, December 25, 2006

Grimerry Gourcemas


That’s right readers, it’s that special day – the anniversary of the birth of the son of this universe’s most wonderful and vengeful (and only) God. While I’m sure most everyone has opened their presents and enjoyed their disappointment by now, we here at the Gource would like to wish you a happy holiday (Christmas – not that other, harder-to-spell one). And of course we’d be first-class nosebleeds not to offer you, the loyal readers, some kind of gift. However, this being the Internet and our devotees being so numerous we haven’t got anything physical/returnable for you. Instead, allow me to present what great new things you readers of the Gource have to look forward to.


More excerpts from my autobiography, a work that is certain to be one of the upcoming year’s most popular sellers/life-changers. Bear in mind that what is posted here does not reflect the numerous changes that are sure to be made during the publishing process, wherein the printmonkeys will no doubt remedy my “typos” and “grammatical errors,” rendering a work that doesn’t truly reflect my ability to convey Incredible Thought.


With headphone ownership on the rise coupled with the fact that both Guffin and myself have magnificent speaking voices, we have decided to join the audiocasting masses. Note – this is not a “podcast,” a term I take issue with for numerous reasons, the likes of which you can read about in…


That’s right, in addition to knowing how to solve the majority of the world’s problems I’m also well-read enough in the technological realm to solve the sort of problems the computer-using elderly need to dial India to fix. However, this segment will not just be me explaining how to get your computer into and out of Safe Mode (Windows users – hold F8 as your machine boots up, pretentious OSX’ers – hold Shift after powering on), instead it will be a place where I will make known my opinions on the issues and developments in the world of technology. Think Slashdot, but without all the coke-bottle-spectacled, Linux-running swine making Simpsons references in the comments section.

Are you ready for the New Year, soldiers of Reason?

Thursday, December 21, 2006

My Life - Don't You Need to Read It?

Dear readers I apologize. As regular visitors have most likely already noticed, there has been somewhat of a drought in the Gource’s activity this past week. This can be attributed to a number of reasons, none of which are an increase in the rational thought of the world. The Army of Reason’s fight continues. While I can’t speak for other contributors, my higher priorities were nothing if not noble: Christmas shopping, angry letters to store owners, reading books about science, etc. However, there is one important commitment that has been eating up a lot of my time: the publication of my autobiography. That’s right loyal masses; soon my life can be words for your eyes to devour so that your brain will bestow upon you the kind of euphoria many a junkie has died trying to amplify.
My book will not kill you.
My book will serve as a useful guide to living the kind of life that rational thought and a love for God dictates – in fact, so much is evident in the title alone:



While it might be some time before the book is ready for publication and distribution I will do what I can to slake what I imagine is an incredible and universal thirst the world has to read what I’ve lived by occasionally sharing snippets from the work. The first can be found immediately beneath this sentence.

Chapter 1 – Wherein I Arrive and Have a Childhood

I was born on a Sunday – the best day to be birthed, if you ask me. It was early in the morning when the Lord saw fit to admit me to this world. I have heard from those present on that day that I was born with my eyes open, ready to look upon this realm and to solve its problems. Many doctors have assured me that this is impossible due to numerous medical facts, but I know that doctors are, for the most part, not to be trusted. My father told me that soon after my arrival he glanced out the window, overcome with joy and wonder. To hear him tell it the sky was ablaze that morning, it being the glorious period when the sun is just cresting the horizon, throwing shadows and sparks while the moon is still visible above it. Some people call this time of morning lunar dawnset, others call it rush hour. There’s one thing everyone agrees on though: that moment on that morning was one in which the world took a very serious step in the right direction.
My childhood was a brief one, as childhood is, by and large, a useless period in a human’s life. Children are capable of very little beyond simple arithmetic and fouling up the pronunciation of numerous basic English sounds, and so I did not feel compelled to devote much of my lifespan to being an incapable waste of resources. Sure, I spent my time in elementary school catering to the foolish whims of the passionless middle-aged women who filled the role of primary caretaker of the students in the Gohnson County school district between the hours of 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., but all the while I was fixated on the future. By age six I had formed a blueprint for my life – one without mistakes – and I can honestly say that so far I have proven myself right about everything time and time again. Throughout the course of this work my plan (henceforth referred to as The Plan) will be made more apparent, and as a result readers of this book will be able to form their own The Plans. Every plan needs a key objective, and I recommend you come up with yours as soon as possible. That’s how I started mine. The Plan’s key objective? Vanquish all foes.
I vanquished my first foe at the age of ten, in the bloodiest conflict Goover Elementary had ever seen. You see, in fourth grade a new student joined the ranks of my “peers” at Gherbert Goover Elementary, one of America’s Perfect Public Schools. But this new student was not perfect – in fact he was severely flawed. His name was William Donaldson, and he fancied himself precocious. There are few things I loathed more as a child than other children who considered themselves above the level of their classmates. Frequently these children were the result of parents with expensive but useless degrees, usually in fields like law or medicine. Let me say, for the record, that my parents’ degrees are of a much more respectable nature: my father has a Master’s in hard work, and my mother a PhD in integrity. “Those aren’t real degrees,” the deans of a number of institutions might argue. Here’s the thing: those deans all have degrees in shit-dickery.
But back to William Donaldson. The day he came into my life was one of the most glorious of my childhood. Why? Because, it was the day that I first received an enemy. At first I thought that, perhaps, Will and I might be friends. He excelled at reading, and was an impeccable speller. He held a similar amount of disdain for his classmates as I did, but for different reasons. But he didn’t know science, and he didn’t go to church. The first trait was evident every day immediately after recess, when our teacher would have us read and do exercises from The World is Mostly Explainable, our science textbook that left room for the possibility that a number of things about the planet were the result of some serious omnipotence. Will was always fouling up his science assignments – he didn’t know his sedimentary from his igneous, if you know what I mean. My knowledge about his religious handicap was obtained even more directly: I invited him to attend church with me. This was, of course, before I knew better than to give people the benefit of the doubt. I’d decided that, despite his inability with the most important subject that is taught in public school, Will might excel in the most important one that isn’t. It was one of the few times I’ve had an incorrect notion.
One Friday during lunch I approached Will, and did my best to behave personably. I explained that I’d deemed him a suitable friend candidate, and wanted to know if he would be interested in attending the services at the church my family was part of that coming Sunday. His answer nearly made me sick: he didn’t go to church. I was floored – never had I run across such malevolence, and in my own cafeteria. I calmed myself though, I proceeded cautiously and asked him to explain, and he obliged. He described how he had never attended church before because his parents weren’t particularly religious, and then he spoke the words that I’m sure he would come to look back on as being his own death knell: “I don’t believe in God.” That was it – I had to act.
My first order of business was to maintain my composure, as I wanted to keep the upper hand in the situation. Calmly I finished my Coke (I always brought my own lunch, and on Friday’s my mother included with it a bottle of the world’s best soda. A glass bottle). I continued talking to Will as if nothing were amiss, and we slogged through the mundane topics of pee-wee soccer, action figures, and how rotten it was to have to go to bed before 10 p.m. After an interminable amount of time lunch was over, and we were released outdoors to enjoy recess. I knew that I would have my best opportunity to destroy this abomination then, behind the playground and beyond the watchful gaze of Mrs. Krumleigh, but in full view of the Lord. I convinced Will to follow me to that secluded area of the grounds using a clever ruse that works on any male child of a low intellect: I told him there was a dead animal to be seen. He was a lamb to the slaughter.
When we reached the location of the corpse I’d promised Will became suspisicous. Fortunately he didn’t remain so for long. As he began to form a question (he got as far as “Hey, where’s th-“) I removed from my pocket the empty glass Coke bottle I’d saved from lunch and brought the bottom of it down on the bridge of his nose so hard I felt the continent move.
“Listen,” I said to him, “There’s something you should know.” He responded by crumpling to his knees and letting out a pitiful moan followed by a couple gasps as his nose had now become quite useless as far as breathing was concerned. “The Bible got a lot of things right,” I continued, speaking slowly and clearly to make sure that he could hear me through his pain. “But I am not one to live and let live.” He stared up at me, eyes widening. I told him to calm down, that I couldn’t take his life, as I wanted to get some kickball in before the end of recess. “But know this,” I said, kneeling down to stare him down, eye to eye. “When the final trumpet blows it’s going to be the people like me – the Guiles Gonoughans of the world – who come out on top, in life and in the afterlife. Isn’t it time you accepted the Lord?” For a fleeting second Will’s facial expression flickered, from misery to confusion. He didn’t get it. I swung my foot with mechanic accuracy, my toe connecting squarely with his forehead, and he was out.
The next day I was brought into the principal’s office and questioned about the splendidly broken nose that Will had been sporting since our conversation on the schoolyard. Apparently after regaining consciousness he simply wandered home, and nobody at the school knew anything about it until the following day. I explained to principal Joylend that Will and I were close friends, and that he’d discussed with me his godlessly abusive parents. The principal, due to misguided beliefs about the physical capabilities of a fourth grader, was inclined to believe that I could not possibly have been the one to deal such damage to dear Will, and by 5 p.m. that evening social services had placed Will into foster care as a result of a concerned phone call from himself and the district’s superintendent. And who should the patriarch of Will’s foster family be but none other than Reverend Nick Matherton, the man whose sermons I enjoyed every Sunday morning.

Hopefully you had the good sense to enjoy that. I plan on continuing doing regular grouses in the coming weeks, though there might be a marked decrease in their frequency given the season and the times. I can’t say when the next autobiography update will come – I know you will all be clamoring for it, but I’d really rather just get the publishing process underway so that you will have the pleasure of being able to read it in its entirety. Until next time, Gource fans.

Muslim Congressmen-Elect - Why Can't They Keep Their Heads Down (Facing West)?

In a recent hellection, the state of Minnesota, one known for bad decisions (not to mention accents) stumblefucked a Muslim into our American House of White Representatives. This is not necessarily a bad idea, as his hellection may prove to Islamicysts around the world that the American system is the best and probably a good idea for their lives, too. The way that this Congressman screwed up is by requesting that he be allowed to be sworn in on the Kqworan, the "holy" book of Islam.
Let me be the first to ask: is this guy kidding me? We do not live in Saudi Arabia or something. We live in the United States of America, a nation where people swear on The Bible and almost always worship Jesus Christ:

As soon as we allow people to choose to swear in on the book of their choice, we open the floodgates to eliminate "Under God" from the Pledge of Allegiance, and then we will be removing crucifices from courtrooms and classrooms, and then we will no longer require us to sign pledges asserting that we are not witches. I would rather be crushed by stones than see a day like this come.
Luckily, there is one brave man who is unafraid to confront the issue. Rather than link you anywhere else, I will do The Gource an honor by printing his words. Here is a letter written by Virginia's 5th District Rep. Virgil Goode to CNN, printed on CNN.com (I bolded the best parts for you):

"When I raise my hand to take the oath on Swearing In Day, I will have the Bible in my other hand. I do not subscribe to using the Quran in any way.

"The Muslim representative from Minnesota was elected by the voters of that district and if American citizens don't wake up and adopt the Virgil Goode position on immigration there will likely be many more Muslims elected to office and demanding the use of the Quran.

"We need to stop illegal immigration totally and reduce legal immigration and end the diversity visas policy pushed hard by President Clinton and allowing many persons from the Middle East to come to this country.

"I fear that in the next century we will have many more Muslims in the United States if we do not adopt the strict immigration policies that I believe are necessary to preserve the values and beliefs traditional to the United States of America and to prevent our resources from being swamped..."

Virgil Goode, you officially win the Gource Grouser of the Year Award. This is awarded semi-regularly to the person or persons who have recently made the most sense in missives sent to CNN. In true TIME Magazine fashion, The Gource encourages you to work hard to be the next winner.

Thursday, December 14, 2006

Viral Marketing - Why Can't You Just Tell Me What to Buy?

I have essentially had it with today’s modern advertising techniques. Recently the idea for people who want to market products is to reveal as little information about what is being sold as possible. This is a concept that doesn’t make any sense, and is not very effective, at least not on people who put at least a scintilla of thought into how they spend their hard-earned money. This past summer Honda wanted to sell me a car by informing that it was, in fact, “go.” This ad campaign had no effect on me for three reasons – I don’t need a car, I sure as hell don’t need a Japanese car, and I sure as all God don’t need to wade through cryptic messages in order to achieve a clear idea of what it is companies want me to want.
Yesterday I passed by a business that had advertisements informing passers-by that they would soon be opening. However, notable information was lacking from their sign, including what it is the store will sell, and why anyone should give a damn. What was even more confusing is that the store’s name is something like “History” and beneath that was written, “coming soon.” I don’t know if this is somebody’s idea of a silly joke, but I’m fairly confident in the fact that history has been around for quite some time - at least since European people started writing things down. This “History” store has already lost a customer before they even had the opportunity to gain one, I can tell you that much.
What’s even more frustrating is when this kind of bullshit advertising shows up on my favorite place: the Internet. Honestly, if Sprite wanted me to drink their lousy product they should try making it taste less terrible as opposed burning my retinas. Honestly, things like this almost make me miss the good old days of pop-up advertising, before those socialist geeks with degrees in computer science decided to start coding solutions to what so many viewed as a “problem.” At least pop-up advertising is straightforward. Please don’t think I’m arguing against subtlety or nuance in the realm of advertising (or any realm for that matter), but it is just plain retarded (that’s right, I used that word) to try to market a product without actually marketing a product.

The Death Penalty - How Do We Solve The Problems With It? (A Gource Short Solution)

If you have been to CNN.com recently, hoping that Tom Waits will stop by and give you an autograph (good luck, idiot), you may have seen a news story about a man in Florida whose execution took thirty-four minutes an required two injections. This is of course another example of shoddy reporting, one that The Gource hopes to rectify here:
The executee, a Mr. Something Diaz, was serving time in hell for a crime committed in 1979. If you ask The Gource, his execution did take too long: 27 years too long. If we lived in a Utopian society, this Diaz monster would have been killed before he killed a different guy. A simple problem, a simple solution.

Prostitutes in England - Is There Any Way to Blah Blah Blah Blah?

People who pay as close attention to the goings-on in our motherland will know that there have been a series of prostitute murders in Suffolk, which is apparently a place there, too. The past month-and-a-half has seen about four or five of these blah blah blah blah
Look: why in the world are we even worrying about these issues? There is a solid, rational reason that serial killers tend to target prostitutes (it is the same reason I satisfy my bloodlust by weekly hunting the bird of the season: there are plenty of them, and they don't really matter. There will always be women who insist on breaking the law just to get in on the world's second-oldest profession (the first is punditry), in the same way that there will always be pheasants or geese or whatever. As The Gource sees it, these killers do us all a favor by eliminating some of the excess: they submit to their urges without bothering the law-abiding public, and they create a greater scarcity in the sex market, which protects the livelihoods of these "women." That way, everyone wins.
Here is what I cannot abide, though: imitation. A recent Gallup poll showed that 86% of the people aware of this serial killing "problem" immediately thought of Jack the Ripper, another civic-minded individual who cut down the prostitute population. I know I did, and I'm smarter than any of the people dumb enough to take a poll. When one makes the life decision to start killing people, one should shoot for originality: these are the murders that serial killers will ultimately be known for.
If this new Ripper wants to make a name for himself while still performing a public service, he could try killing drug users--these are more criminals whose lives aren't worth as much as yours or mine.

The Salvation Army - Why the Ruckus?

It happened again yesterday. I was walking briskly to one of the area’s many pharmacies in order to purchase something that might take my mind off the aggravation that comes from having to listen to an inordinate number of dumb people complain to me about how they feel about the work the Army of Reason and myself are doing. I was planning on buying a Coke and a bottle of isopropyl alcohol – the former for drinking, the latter for throwing into the eyes of the next person who decides they need to tell me their opinion on anything. Anyway, as I neared the busy square in which the pharmacy is nestled my ears met with a familiar sound: the incessant ringing of a bell, the clatter of which everyone in the immediate area was trying to ignore. The Salvation Fucking Army.
I know, I know, it’s to be expected this time of year. Everyone and their adopted brother (who they’re secretly ashamed of) is in the spirit of giving during this the time God makes his Creation feel most guilty about its prosperity. I’m not going to complain about charity per se, because I’m sure that my reasoned arguments would be wasted on the kind of dullards who throw their money away and see nothing in return for it. But I do take issue when a charitable organization sees fit to launch a pre-emptive aural strike on me.
As far as I can tell the Salvation Army’s concept of how a successful charity works can be summed up in a simple equation: Noise = Money. For anyone who has any kind of respect for the complex and terrifying realm of mathematics this expression is probably painful to look upon, as it is blindingly incorrect. Much like Greenpeace (an organization that believes it is ok to approach and engage me in conversation about issues I do not agree with them on), the Salvation Army has crossed the boundary of appropriate social behavior and has begun actively seeking out the attention of complete strangers. Like all reasonable people I do not enjoy loud, arrhythmic noises, especially those that emanate from a bell in the clutches of an underfed Santa impersonator whose mere existence is an unnecessary drain on society. This is why Target is the best store. Target doesn’t let the Salvation Army stand around in front of their establishments bugging the bejesus out of people who just want to buy things to help ease the pain of living in a world where the Gource isn’t the final authority on matters involving noise pollution.

Global Warming - Is it Ruining Your Life Too?

I don’t know about you, but this global warming business is real trouble, the likes of which we haven’t had to contend with since those long-haired goons started shutting down higher learning institutions in protest of one of America’s better wars. This is serious, folks. In case you’re unaware of the issue, global warming is an affliction our planet might currently be infected with, as it is displaying the textbook symptoms of sunny skies and balmy Decembers.
Most people blame global warming on pollution and red meat, and they’re at least half right. I’ve never considered myself an environmentalist as doing so would force me to forfeit my right to use showers, deodorants, and – most importantly – shoes. However, if pollution is to blame for global warming then I might have to rethink a lot of things, like my insistence on riding only in cars that were originally designed for military use but have been retrofitted for America’s suburban streets, and my habit of leaving every piece of electronic equipment I own on at all times (I do this just in case, you know?).
“But Guiles,” one might ask, “Why do you care so deeply about global warming?” Let me first enumerate reasons that are not important to me: polar ice caps, the rainforest, Alaska, costal cities named Los Angeles, birds, and the hot chocolate industry. What makes global warming such an important issue to me is the impact it has on nature’s fairest season: winter. As I have mentioned before, I am an avid winter enthusiast. The season is set to begin in a week and yet when I stick my hand out the window all I feel is the hateful radiation of this planet’s sun. Right now it’s fifty degrees outside, and this is in a city known for a winter whose brutality exceeds that of most police officers. This is unreasonable. Who will kill the homeless if not Old Man Winter? How can we keep the elderly population under control if they don’t incinerate themselves and their neighbors after forgetting about that old Korean War-era space heater? How will America’s wool farmers sell their products? We need winter, and by God I’m ready to fight for it.


Monday, December 11, 2006

Apologizing - Why Do Editors Do It?

There has been a recent rash of editors for little-respected rags apologizing for the content of these shmatas to the community at large. It is important now that The Gource state: This is a thing we will never do. There are a couple of important reasons for this.
1) Our editors read our content. In this case, I expect blogspot's spellcheck to give this article a once-over, and then I myself may re-read it to reaffirm the veracity of my own statements. There is no way anything can slip by--in other words, everything that should be edited, has.
2) We do not wait to see the public response to our material and then jump back if we have pushed too hard. We have 100% confidence in the integrity of our publication, and about 17% confidence in the integrity of the community at large (the figure is slightly higher when the test sample includes only readers of The Gource.
I state this here because there has been considerable fallout from a recent article in The Gource. The article in question referred to gays ("homosexuals") as "mincing effetes in ballet slippers" who wish they could "be women." One letter to us states:
Sirs:
In a recent article of The Grimary Gource, you stated [see above]...I personally am very offended. I am a longtime follower of The Gource and usually agree 100% with your politics and opinions. I have often wondered, though, why there aren't more [gay people] who write for your publication. Your article settled the issue for me. It is not that your political views in general are [homophobic], but rather that somehow, by a strange coincidence, the vast majority of people who hold your political views are [homophobic]. You do a great disservice to those of us who have no problem with [gay people] but happen to agree that ugly people should not be allowed on the T.
We were prepared for this. We have heard these criticisms before, and knowingly printed what we did, steadfast in our feelings. We refuse to back down, because we have principles and we know they are right. Can you say the same?

Sunday, December 10, 2006

Clay - Great American Hero, or Terrorist Threat?

First, fuck you. It is a real letter.

This is my first address to the Infantry of the Army of Reason, the Gource's massive and ever-growing support base of readers, those little right-thinking soldiers who make this all possible - each of whom, in his own small way, is pushing us closer to That Time. I'm sure many of you subscribe to the country's diversionary altar of entertainment, the sporting pastimes, and so may have seen espn.com's recent outrageous cultural claim.
I'm not here to argue about the merits of their assertion. There are other, less respectable organizations for that. Frankly, I do not care to know who created 'rap' and am not sorry to see two of the worst cultural influences of the last forty years lumped together. Rather, the article made me reflect at the troubling way that the perception of Cassius Clay, alias Muhammad Ali, has changed over those years. It seems a shame that a man who refused to go to war for his country is now acclaimed as a national hero, and a brash, disrespectful man who constantly proclaimed himself the greatest of all time and called his opponents gorillas is now held to have created a major musical movement.

Clay could not prevent these damning pictures from getting out.

As an added offense, ESPN has enlisted another now-respected agitator to narrate (or as these people say, M.C.) the proceedings, namely Carlton Ridenhour, alias Chuck D. Like Clay, Ridenhour was imprisoned after refusing his patriotic duty to go to war for his country. (Ridenhour rejected a tour in the Gulf War in 1990, scandalously commenting in the press, "I'm a black man, and I can never be a veteran" before being deservedly locked up. Know your facts.) They've also recruited noted public enemies Al Sharpton and Sidney Poiter, aiming to make this program as offensive as possible.

Unfortunately, only one of these men was assassinated.

Of course the most troubling aspect of Clay's life is his religion, one has has been constantly at odds with our own. Are we not, in fact, at war with Islam all over the world? While Clay has always claimed to advocate pacifism, I hold with this upstanding journalist's good work on the subject and ask Clay, in Beck's words, to prove to me and all of us good Christian Reason-Soldiers that he is not a terrorist. We have a thing called burden of proof in this country, Mr. Clay, and also a right to deport or imprison possible enemies of freedom like yourself. We are not fooled by your put-on, pretended illness, which is surely merely a front to make you seem harmless. Clay is not the first terrorist to hide behind a physical disability. It is nearly time for the Army of Reason to mobilize against people like the venerated Clay. Will you be ready?Clay presiding over a jihadist religious ceremony. The connection between the Muslims and the Nazis has not yet been satisfactorily explored.

Saturday, December 09, 2006

Racist Celebrities - Why are They News?

As you might imagine, a person as efficient as myself can often wind up with a fair amount of free time. I realize that such a luxury is rare for many, and will be quick to reassure you that I do not waste these unfilled hours with trivial pursuits like table tennis or miniature golf (would to God that I could though, there are no miniature links nearby).
However, on occasion I do find myself hemorrhaging my idle time clicking passively through the regions of the internet that claim to give me the “real” news stories about “things” I “care about.” How wrong these sites are.
Lately (as in last month) all anybody wanted to talk about was the racist tirade spouted off by once-kind-of-famous tall person/actor Michael Richards. Before that it was “oh what’s to be done about Mel Gibson the drunken anti-Semite?” Now the world’s all up in arms because America’s favorite talking manatee made a remark about how news of America’s favorite drunken gnome’s appearance on this country’s dumbest TV show was reaching far and wide to the vast reaches of the Orient. So what, America?
Here’s the thing about racism: it’s been a staple of Hollywood for about as long as we kicked the red-man out of Los Angeles. The Indians had founded the city, which they called Shakemtown, as a holy land because something bad always wound up happening there. White settlers eventually moved in, killed the Indians, set up boulevards, and renamed the place. Did anybody go crazy and write to YouTube when this happened? No. So why all the fuss now? Sure, it isn’t popular to hold racist attitudes, but why are actors’ opinions on anything even relevant? I thought it was common knowledge that 93% of all actors are dumber than the average Australian, and therefore not worth listening to unless someone else wrote the words they are speaking, and the whole affair is taking place in front of the kind of camera that requires 3 years to learn how to operate.
Maybe it’s time America stopped paying so much attention to what actors – especially unattractive actors – have to say about various societal and political issues facing the world in this High-Definition age. Maybe it’s time America started paying a little more attention to the Grimary Gource.

New Contributors - Do You Have What It Takes To Be One?

Close readers of The Gource will observe that two entries out of the past 32 have been written by persons other than this reporter or Guiles Gonoughan. Following these events, The Gource's inbox has been flooded with questions such as "Who are these new contributors?" "Who taught you people punctuation?" and most importantly, "Can I contribute to the Gource?" The answers are simple, and are enumerated as follows:
1) They are Galley Gorkin, Gephie Goplan, and Gade Gickels Addendum: GunĂ°er Gastergack
2) Ms. Gonca, 3-4 grade
3) Almost definitely not. Our contributors (see #1) were handpicked from the ranks of the finest publications to be found. More often than not, these writers far outshone their publications (think Kurt Vonnegut writes for TV Guide), which made them that much easier to pick. After Guiles and I have picked a list of five writers each, we cut our papers into slivers (one name per sliver), and then pick three from a hat.
So, it is unlikely that you can make it through our meticulous process of choosing writers. If you disagree, however, you may email us and try your luck against the hat.

Trees - Plants or Animals?

Plants.
Obviously plants.
But trees share some pretty undeniably similar characteristics with animals that are worth taking a look at, unless you're a biology major, in which case, you might get offended (if you're not already). In fact, some trees are so animal-like that professionals in the field call them "tranimals." As you can imagine, if the term were ever widely publicized, "tranimals" would spawn a host of problems with vegetarians and Christmas-killing Jews who keep Kosher, so the coinage has been a well-guarded secret within small circles to keep things simple for the small-minded masses.
But here I am letting you in on the secret. Good thing this blog protects my identity.
Perhaps the best example of a "tranimal" is the tree from Charles Schultz's "Peanuts." Let's observe:

To the untrained eye, this looks like a perfectly normal tree, which is generally referred to as a "plant." However, trained eyes may notice a grin within the leaves. This grin has been observed on many animal species, such as:

Is it an accident that both the aforementioned tree and the aforementioned animal (clearly a cat) share the same grin? I don't think so. I don't think so AT ALL.
Damn tranimals. Damn conspiracy theories.

Thursday, December 07, 2006

Science and Religion - Isn't it Time they Reconciled?

Now, this should come as no surprise to loyal readers, but I myself am an extremely reasonable man. I grew up in a house where the laws of God and the laws of physics were both followed to the letter. As a result of this sensible upbringing I have matured into the kind of person petty men resent, courageous men respect, and all virtuous women love. Obviously folks like myself are harder to come by than you might expect, especially in portions of the country that put too much or too little emphasis on the two most powerful forces in the universe: God and science.
The fact that God (the Christian one, of course) is magnificently powerful shouldn’t be news to anyone whose postmortem plans involve an extremely nice Kingdom in which to spend eternity. However there are many people – especially on the coasts of this country – who were not brought up with sufficient doses of vitamin G during their formative years. These are people who can frequently be found shouting at government buildings, wearing inappropriate clothes and failing to keep their front yards in good order. However, most were educated in schools that did a decent job of teaching science.
There is another end to this spectrum of unreasonable people – those with plenty of love for the Lord in the many chambers and foyers of their hearts, but without proper knowledge of how the universe fits together on a sub-meta-physical level. These people can often be found in southern states, far-western landlocked states, and states whose names rhyme with “Oh my, no.” It’s fairly obvious that a healthy fear of the invisibly omniscient is extremely important in the making of a Good Person, more important than being able to explain a catalytic converter, but the ability to apply the scientific method to everything that isn’t the Creator of the Universe is still indispensable. This brings me to the conclusion you probably predicted I’d come to had you read the opening question title of this article: Science and Religion (Christianity) need to be a major part of a person’s brain in order for that person to be as terrific as myself. In order to form a more perfect union I suggest that these two great tastes become mandatory in every form of education available to our nation’s youth, from public schools to billboards on lonely interstates. Private schools won’t be required to teach balanced educations, however, as most of their students wind up being the kind of people who are impossible to deal with people no matter what measures are taken. So come on America, improve your mind, improve your soul, download this .pdf, print tons of copies and hang them up everywhere. If people see this flyer hanging in a property that is yours, they will recognize you as one of the rational, religious elite.

Wednesday, December 06, 2006

Jews - What is Wrong With Them Already?

Recently, there has been an increase in the amount of Jewish-related activity, as there always is around the Holidays. In the past couple of years, they have been fighting to eliminate such pleasantries as, "Merry Christmas," and "God Bless Us - Every One," and "Hello." As evidenced by our public school system as it stands, their efforts have been largely successful, which means that we are losing the War On Religious Christians with Dogs Or Families.
As The Gource predicted a year ago, if we give in to the Jews' demands, they will be emboldened to try to eliminate further traces of our once proud culture. If the Jews get their way, a century from now all that will remain of American culture will be some VHS copies of Rob Reiner movies. This cannot happen.
Anyway, as usual, The Gource was correct. This year, the Jews are teaming up with the atheist Jews and the black Jews and trying to get eggnog banned in all public places. Eggnog, long a staple of Christian cuisine and Holiday good spirit, is also like arsenic to the Jews, and like old lace to the atheists. It is also, more importantly, completely delicious.
Their activity does not end here. They are also mandating that all public schools replace any interior lighting with menorahs, and serve latkes for lunch once a week. All courtrooms must fly the Israeli flag, and the rapper Ice-T must go only by his pseudonym "Iceberg."
We cannot allow them to do this. Jews already have their own private spaces (they're called "synagogues," people) - what gives them the right to infringe on our public places?
There is only one way to stop them. If we can separate neighborhoods in New York City (I like to call it “Jew York City” or “Hymietown”), Los Angeles, and Miami, and make these neighborhoods Jew-only, prohibiting Jews from leaving them, we retain public spaces for the American Christian tradition, something everyone can agree is good. Who’ll drink to that?

Tuesday, December 05, 2006

CNN.com - Can They Sink Any Lower?

If you are at all like me (and God save you if you're not), you have recently been to CNN.com. You, like me, probably spend a solid twenty hours a week on the website, posting comments on the articles pointing out gaps in journalistic prowess to the site's editors. Really, the website is to online news what Meg White is to online nudity.
Anyway, you have probably noticed that recently CNN.com has started summarizing its articles, like so:
This "story highlights" portion is clearly designed to allow readers of the website to move on to more important articles. They do not have to feel guilty (like they do for just reading the headlines), but they also don't have to clean the drool off their keyboards when they fall asleep after reading one paragraph of this Melville-esque prose.
In the interest of full disclosure, it should be noted that this commentator writes for The Grimary Gource. I think, though, that you will not disagree when I state that The Gource gives you news in a way you can read.
Anyway, this new practice of CNN's is abominable. No, I know what you're thinking; I am not some Highlander-watching stopgap who thinks that news worth reading must be understood with complete context, and thus this sort of summarizing only serves to obscure truth or decrease American knowledge of important issues or whatever stupid business these people whine about when they're not mixing red and white wine and painting their faces with the results.
The Gource thinks that this practice is unnerving because it is certain to bring more readers to CNN.com, just as every student at Gufts flocks to the teacher who doesn't require homework to be done in a timely manner or a legible font. This sort of dissemination of false information to the masses can only mean bad news for those of us in the upper echelon of masculinity and brains. Ultimately, of course, it is a futile gesture, as those who refuse to read CNN.com will always be more powerful than those who read its story highlights, but it certainly doesn't make our jobs any easier.

Monday, December 04, 2006

Christmas Decorations - Don't They Make You Sick Too?

Seriously, what did the lord Jesus Christ do to deserve this kind of tacky-ass treatment? Now before you stop reading and assume that I’m just going to attack the commercialization of Christmas for the next three paragraphs, don’t. I’m not some sort of creepy, middle-aged pastor at a tiny church in America’s beloved heartland – I haven’t got the wardrobe for it – and I don’t mind that the Real God’s birthday has been turned into a furious consumer spectacle. What bothers me is the way that people who lack a real sense of duty to God have decided is an appropriate way to doll up their houses for his birthday.
Listen: just because a snowman can be created using inflatable material does not mean it’s a good idea to buy 4 of them and to station them like corpulent sentries all around your domicile. It may seem remarkable that a nativity scene can be created entirely out of PVC and painted with lifelike precision by machines, but this does not give you license to inflict it upon my eyes every time I pass by your front yard. I didn’t ask for this. God didn’t ask for this. Nobody asked for this. But there it is.
Let me impart some religious education on you, dear readers. Christmas has, despite what some bivouacs might tell you, 3 distinct meanings. They are as follows:

  • Family, togetherness, the colors red and green, office parties that everyone laments afterwards. This is the meaning on which God puts the most emphasis.
  • Buy everything, and destroy any who impede you in your quest. This is the meaning on which America puts the most emphasis.
  • Suicide is a viable option for many, and there’s no better time than now, especially if you put up ugly decorations or knock on my door anytime in December. This is the meaning on which I put the most emphasis.

Keep them in mind, would you? It’s getting colder, and beastly New England is finally recalling that it’s the last month of the year, and that it really ought to be colder at this point than it is. We’re thick with the spirit of things. Hold on though, it’ll be over soon enough.

Thursday, November 30, 2006

Hypnotism - Can It be Used For Good?

In a recent article in the Gource, this writer suggested that the world is divided into two main castes: people who are smart and soon to be in charge, and the people who can't spell "gingham." Despite my numerous and broad examples, I was swamped with e-mails and text messages begging me how one could identify and classify members of these two castes. I thought for nearly five minutes about this before coming up with what I know to be a solid solution.
For centuries, there have been men who walk among us and possess a troubling power over most of us. They are called hypnotists. With mere watches or shiny objects, they can make people think something is not true, even if that thing is true. There is known to be no escape from their guiles, right?
No, stupid. Smart people cannot be hypnotized. As a member of this planet's intelligensia, I can say with complete authority that there is nothing on earth that can make me change my mind about an issue, or misunderstand important facts. I am steadfast.
So I encourage one and all to attend any hypnotism shows they can find. See if you can pass the acid test of intelligence. If so, welcome back. If not, don't feel bad. Take heart in knowing that your role as cannon fodder is completely assured.

Wednesday, November 29, 2006

Silent Movies – Do They Still Have Relevance to Modern Audiences?

Let’s face it America: we are a world of dialogue. With text messages, e-mails, and instant messaging, it is nearly impossible to get a point across in a sarcastic tone. In fact, irony on the internet is very much dead. To compensate for this, we have developed a culture that relies solely on words and what they mean. No more of this verbal ambiguity that has so marred our literature and music for so long: it is time to use words literally and without any sort of complications.
This is as evident as anywhere in film. One example of film (in fact, the best film ever made), Good Will Hunting, relies almost entirely on dialogue to explain what is happening within the characters’ minds and how they feel about themselves and one another. The reason that this movie was so successful and has withstood the test of time and made celebrities of all its stars is that its use of dialogue makes it the perfect film for our time. Observe:

Consider then, the oeuvre of Charlie Chaplin. His films largely involve men in small bowlers and huge pants, whose moustaches are tight and clipped and who carry a cane. There is also no audible dialogue. Can it be said that any person alive can relate to these characters, or their stories?* The “curse of the silent film-maker” followed Chaplin into his forays into talkies: his “opus,” The Great Dictator, is mostly about an intolerant dictator and a Jewish barber—clearly, Chaplin had lost the ability to make a movie that would make sense to viewers after 1945. Observe:

It would be unreasonable, of course, for us to throw out our entire history in film (with the possible exception of Hope/Crosby Road movies, which are far from being as fantastic as you’d think). The solution to this issue is to dub dialogue into existing silent films. Include lines that apply to modern audiences, such as “I’d better check the internet!” and “O.J. is guilty as sin!” Only by doing this can we maintain a connection to our cinematic past. If we want one.

The Gap Between Rich and Poor – Aren’t There More Important Gaps To Discuss?

Hardly a day goes by without a mild-mannered human being (generally over six feet tall) being bombarded by concerns about the growing gap between rich and poor—these bombardments usually come in the form of pamphlets or crumpled-up five-dollar bills, depending on which side of the gap is doing the bombardment. This is unacceptable, and not just because the Gource stands opposed to any and all persons who wish to inflict their opinions on us. All studies show that the only reason that there is a growing gap between rich and poor is that there are more people alive, and also because of inflation. Know your facts. The rich have more dollars because the dollar is worth less (our damned treasury refuses to give production a rest), and the poor still have no dollars. Thus: the gap. Stop talking about it.
Here is the real gap that is widening in a realistic way: the gap between smart and stupid. Those of us in the former category know more and more information each day, especially if people in this category regularly read the Gource. Those in the latter category, people who seem to refuse to spend the time each day perusing our archives, are getting left behind in this knowledge boom.
Is this a problem? Not at all. It is merely the natural development of a meritocracy. The smarter people are getting the tools they need to lead our society into the next millennia, and the stupider people are getting the tools they need to be cannon fodder in any upcoming wars against Asia (don’t worry, they have similar policies there of weeding out the smarter ones and letting the rest fight our fools).
Now, the Gource recommends that you begin to prime yourself for leadership. Brush your teeth. Learn to do your own tie. Your time is coming, and the Gource is here to ease and expedite the transition.

Ringtones - Why Aren't They All Identical?

Today I found myself face-to-face with something that the average human being hopes to never encounter: a Mario Bros. ringtone. The phone within which it resided belonged to a person that appeared tolerable, even genial. There is a lesson to be learned from my observation (as always): even if you think a person can be dealt with, he or it probably cannot. Be. Dealt. With.
The sort of person who would possess a phone containing a Mario Bros. ringtone is ineffably the sort of person who would drive a 10-speed bicycle on the sidewalk, or vomit in a mailbox. This is a social ill that must be corrected and cured, like polio or poverty or perversion. And I think any reasonable reader of this publication can recognize that Mario Bros. rings are not the only existing ringtones that show their owners’ true colors: popular “hip-hop” song ringtones are often tied to pedophilia and suicide, TV show theme songs have been known to appeal to people who purchase faded denim and cowboy hats.
There is only one solution here. Actually, strike that. The solution I am about to present is one that not only corrects this malady, but also serves to aid and abet the correction of nearly every problem we face as a society: uniformity. How do we stop people from shooting out windows? Force them to act like everybody else: leering at mannequins. How do we stop people from giving birth to children with deformities? Force them to tearily get abortions, like every teenager. And how do we stop people from getting ringtones that bother the average Caucasian? Mandate identical ringtones for all persons, regardless of height.
The ringtone I would humbly recommend is minute seven of “The Murder Mystery” by the Velvet Underground. This suitably gets the attention of anyone nearby, a message that says: “Listen up! There is a person here with important business to attend to! More important than you! Goodbye!” Furthermore: imagine a roomful of people with their cell phones going off. The sweet cacophony would alert all present that we live in a better, less diverse world.

Creativity - How Much is Too Much?

Imagine a world where everyone goes around making sense all the time. Actually, you don’t need to imagine one, because if you’re looking at this webpage and reading closely you’re already in such a world, confined as it may be to words on a screen. Now, imagine a world where everybody goes around thinking outrageous thoughts, spilling paint and dung on canvas and displaying it with pride, writing absurd novels about fantastic worlds where bears can talk or where a spoiled shit of a person who’s always bummed-out wanders around the worst city in the country. It’s a warm world. It’s a world governed by “creativity.” It’s hell.
Let me tell you what brought this on, as my opening statements might be somewhat confusing to someone who isn’t privy to all the facts, and as you know the Grimary Gource is all about aiding people in knowing their facts. This morning I was sitting in one of Gufts University’s many fact-centric classes, taking notes and not doodling frivolous contour drawings of things that don’t exist. All of a sudden I realize that the professor has yielded the floor to some round-faced nosebleed of a human being, and this walking, talking, sushi-eating human aneurysm is babbling on about creativity in classes at Gufts. Apparently he was a member of some group of manicured beatniks (I know – it sounds like a paradox of some kind) called “Writing Fellows” who wanted to conduct a survey regarding attitudes students have about the level of creativity they’re allowed to exhibit in their classwork.
First of all: what the hell? Writing Fellows? Are my tuition dollars going towards a bunch of people who sit around putting words into word processors? Are these people getting paid? Getting laid? If the answer to either of those questions is “yes” then I imagine it’s high time I stopped by the hardware store to pick up a sledgehammer, because it’s clear that some thick-skulled administrator has made an egregious oversight, and God knows we don’t want these people reproducing. Universities are not places to foster creativity. If you want to hone your yarn-spinning skills, (or even your storytelling skills), feel free to walk barefoot in the general direction of the Pacific and join the first commune you find. I came to school to put additional information into my brain in as efficient a manner as possible. Guess what: filling out a survey that asks me whether or not I strongly agree, agree, neutrally agree, disagree, or strongly disagree that I’m given enough room for free thinking is not teaching me anything, all it’s doing is reminding me of what a mistake attending a private institution was.
You see I went to one of America’s Perfect Public Schools – where the rules are many and the curricula concrete. The kind of place where people who wore shirts with inflammatory statements were escorted to the cement slab behind the dumpsters and taught the importance of Newtonian physics with regards to steel-toed boots and their throats. Did we waste time on the vodka-soaked nonsense some Russian epileptic made a narrative out of? Absolutely not. We were taught to tests, and the tests taught us to answer questions we would be asked on future tests. This is a system that makes cold mechanical sense – which, If you ask me – is the best kind of sense. Keep this in mind the next time someone without morals or rational asks you to think abstractly about something. If an answer can’t be reached without doing some kind of metaphorical back flip then the question is probably some kind of godless lie.

Tuesday, November 28, 2006

Ties - Why Don't You Know How To Do Them?

Look, America. It's time to shape up. Here I am talking to the men (women, take a lap). For too long men have gotten by on not knowing how to do a tie, and that is absolutely ridiculous. This is tantamount to sitting down while peeing, or using a tissue to blow one's nose. With the loss of the doing-a-tie ability follows the loss of any facet of masculinity, until the United States is just an enormous island of Lesbos, where there are women and there are men who can't do ties (women).
Let me cut you off there as you try to announce loudly that women you know are able to do ties. Shut up. This is an abomination. There are plenty of men whose wives or fiancees do their ties for them; there are also plenty of babies whose mommies wipe their asses. Time to grow up and be a man. If your woman is doing your tie, you have completely ceded any sort of male responsibility. Unacceptable.
There was a time when being a man meant doing one's own tie, and hunting animals, and flexing nuts. Historically, men who could do their own ties were 89% more likely to gain political stardom than those who could not. Know your facts. Today, the figure is closer to 760%. Which means that those men who cannot do their own ties create a power vacuum, one that can only be filled by women, children, or animals. Get fucking serious.
This means no more clip-on ties. Even bow ties. Learn to do those, because then you can undo it at the end of a long night and you'd look great. But you have no sense of this, because the closest you've ever gotten to a tuxedo is one of those t-shirts. Throw that out.
Until men can do their own ties with a 100% success rate, they (I am a man, but I can do my own ties, so I need not include myself here) will continue to be relegated to backhoe operation and Chinese food preparation. What a sorry state for us to be in.

Monday, November 27, 2006

NYPD - Isn't It Time They Improved Their Aim?

Recently there has been an uproar over the impromptu execution of a guilty black groom, the classic archetype from crime stories and detective novels. The man, Sean Bell, was felled by two bullets. He was driving with two friends, who took eleven and three bullets, still managing to survive. The car itself was hit twenty-one times. In total, fifty bullets were fired. This is absolutely unacceptable. The NYPD must step up its game if it is to compete in the law enforcement economy.
The Gource will definitely be the only news source to relate this event to several precedents: in 1999, Amadou Diallo was killed by nineteen of forty-one bullets fired by NYPD as he reached for his weapon. In 2003, Ousmane Zongo was hit in the back by two of the four bullets that killed him. Clearly, the NYPD has not learned from its past mistakes and improved its gun-training program.
Need the Gource remind NYPD that it is our tax dollars (well, not the Gource's, thank Christ, but the dollars of seedy New York denizens) that buy their bullets? With this absurd and haphazard program of wasting bullets, the police are throwing away resources that could be used to clean graffiti off the subways and elderly.
Those who have seen the excellent film The Professional know that it should only take one bullet to kill a man. This current practice of basically throwing bullets at every dangerous criminal and hoping for a 50% success rate is ludicrous. The Gource calls for New York to shut down its police department until it is properly trained the methods for subduing violent felons. Until they do this, we will just be flushing our hard-earned money down the toilet on behalf of the world's laziest police service, which is ironically stationed in the city with the most criminals.

Saturday, November 25, 2006

Gourcegiving Grouses Part 2: The Meal - Does it Ever Go Right?



Probably not. I have to admit that I have little to no personal experience with Thanksgiving dinner, since the Gonoughan clan is a sensible one, and we tend not to buy into ridiculous pageantry and foolish gluttony. As for my single self, well I’m just not a proponent of meals in any form. However, according to most of the people who’re fortunate enough to know me, Thanksgiving dinner is a very special occasion for a lot of families. This confuses me though, since it seems hard to believe that an annual disaster can hold such a special place in the hearts of the masses.
“An annual disaster? What are you talking about, Guiles?” Dear reader, I’m talking about Thanksgiving. Oh, I know, I’m sure your family’s celebration is always just as Norman Rockwell as can be, but the truth of the matter is this is not the case for the majority of the world. Don’t believe me? Try watching a sitcom for once in your life. Never (and I mean rarely) do these Thanksgiving dinners go off without one to twelve hitches, usually within the space of 22 minutes. Sometimes it’s just a small snag, like the dog dies because the mom fed the dog turkey giblets (all dogs are allergic to giblets). Other times the problems faced on Thanksgiving are greater, like when a boy has to talk to one of his insane aunts, and she is just so terrible to look at. He has to be polite though, because alcoholism isn’t something you’re allowed to get angry with someone over. Which is bullshit. These are the sorts of things that can only happen when everyone from a family is foolish enough to congregate under one roof.
And why turkey? This is a bird that nature has done its best to convince us not eat. It’s flightless, making it not fun to catch and slaughter, it’s brown (nature’s most boring color), and it’s hideous. What more do you people need? Maybe a stone tablet signed by God himself reading, “seriously, stop eating turkeys” would do it. But no, the unwashed opt instead to jam stuffing into the cavity the bird’s innards once occupied. That is seriously gross America.
Finally, I take issue with the giving thanks aspect of Thanksgiving. Thanking someone is admitting appreciation, and if someone knows you appreciate them then they’re bound to stop trying so hard to earn your approval. Is Thanksgiving just one gigantic scheme to get everyone in America to take each other for granted? Probably. The subversive nature of this damnable holiday makes me sick, the kind of sick that has to go sit in front of a TV for four to six hours instead of trying desperately to warn the world at a large about the danger sitting around interacting with their families poses. You’re on your own come next year.

Wednesday, November 22, 2006

Gourcegiving Grouses Part 1: Air Travel – Isn’t it Tortuous?

Time for something special, Gource fans. It’s a holiday-filled period of the year, which means that hundreds (seriously, hundreds) of people around this country will pack a bag heavy with clothes and passive aggressiveness, hail a cab, and find themselves at an airport on their way to spend time they don’t really know why they have with people they don’t really feel anything for. A key and terrible factor in this ordeal? Air travel. For those paying even a marginal amount of attention it should be abundantly clear that the Grimary Gource hates air travel. However, due to extenuating circumstances (grievously low speed limits mostly) land travel between my two primary residences during the holidays is inconvenient and unforgivably time-consuming. As a result I was forced to travel through the planet’s least reliable state of matter (plasma is actually more reliable than gas) yesterday. What follows are some articulated thoughts that my mind crafted regarding the heinousness of flight.

Airport Security – why bother?

Let’s face facts, America – there are a lot of people who hate this country running around (most without shoes). Unfortunately for us, some America-haters do have shoes, and therefore are allowed into airports around this (mostly) terrible planet. Net result? We’re in constant danger. Does this danger justify giving a college dropout a minimum wage job that revolves entirely around digging through my checked baggage looking for national threats like some kind of truffle-rooting pig? No. I am an extremely efficient and particular person, and when I pack a suitcase I pack it to my expert specifications. When some doltish TSA goon goes and rearranges the innards of my duffel I feel as though my trip has been ruined before I’ve even had a chance to leave the ground. I mean, it’s not like I layer clothing according to a planned order-of-wearing schedule I've formulated while I pack it, so that I will never have to dig through my bag in order to find socks while away from home, is it? Oh wait. It is. If I wanted all my clothes disorganized, wrinkled, and sullied by strange hands I’d just drop them off at a foreign-run dry cleaner. If I have to sacrifice a skyline or two every seventy years to keep some ape out of my personal belongings, so be it.

People Who Sit Next to Me on Planes – what idiot notion drives you to strike up conversation?

I want you to think about the FAA for a moment. This is an agency that handles all kinds of important stuff, like going places and coming from places. They have rules, regulations, and lists of specifications longer than the laundry list of people with three-letter names who I wish were dead (long story). How is it then, that among all these countless codes and lengths of endless red tape there is no simple rule that makes it an arrestable – no – executable offense to bug the blinding hell out of a complete stranger on an aircraft? What’s more, every time I have to deal with one of these clowns they always seem to have some kind of regional accent, as though every airport has a distressingly stereotypical representative whose sole purpose in life is to get on planes, sit next to me, and start throwing around “y’alls,” “down the shores,” “hellas,” or “I am from the Pacific Northwest and want to kill myself’s.” Shut up, shut up, and shut up.

In-flight Entertainment – who’s in charge of this media abortion?

Ever wanted to know what kind of golf club will get a golf ball to go to the place a man in stupid clothes desires it to go? Curious about the faucets and fixtures of the rich and famous? Interested in buying a llama? If you answered “no” to any of the following questions it’s extremely likely that watching the in-flight entertainment on a one and a half to two-hour flight will make you regret color LCD’s ever became an affordable airline expense. Personally, I don’t understand the need for any form of stimulation on an airplane, be it audio, visual, olfactory, or sexual. Sit quietly, look ahead or close your eyes. If you’re feeling adventurous: fall asleep. It seems most people don’t agree with me though, and prefer to have some kind of mindless escape in the form of a glowing rectangle of pixels. I realize that my patience and attention span are far more massive than the average person’s, so I can forgive this need for distraction. What I can’t forgive are the airline’s choices in regards to what ought to be shown on their crafts. Does regular TV programming not work at twenty-five thousand feet? Can nobody affix a couple rabbit-ear antennas to the rudder so I could at least get some local news from “flyover” states? No. I’m forced to endure programs about people who live lives so full of comfort and luxury they can afford special shelves for their platinum-plated croquet mallets. How many people are involved in the production of this stuff? I feel like the amount of technical knowledge required to light, shoot, edit, and distribute this dreck could be better spent aiding the action movie filmmakers of America so I could go to a good blow-them-all-to-hell flick without having to read a Dickensian mass of subtitles.

Finally: a list of airports that had I the power, I would shut down

Dallas Ft. Worth
LaGuardia
JFK
Newark (are there any other airports that serve NYC that I’m not aware of? If so, they go on the list too.)
LAX
Dallas Ft. Worth
Orlando International
McCarren International
Atlanta International
Dallas Ft. Worth

Monday, November 20, 2006

Other Publications - Isn't It Time You Ignored Them?

Here is a nifty bit of publicity for the Gource. We are unfavorably compared to a competing rag by that rag itself; you can be the judge of quality. Whom am I fooling? You can't be any sort of judge. Allow me to be the judge. The Gource is of higher quality than any other Gufts publication. Once you have read the article about us and commented to the effect that we are superior, we strongly discourage you from continued perusal.




Friday, November 17, 2006

High Fructose Corn Syrup - Don't We Need More?

Simply put: yes. This country, and to a lesser extent, this hemisphere, need more high fructose corn syrup. If you’re retarded I’ll answer the question that’s probably meandering through your molasses-thick thought process: high fructose corn syrup is mana from heaven, sweet ambrosia that the gods of food engineering saw fit to give mankind. I’ll tell you how I came to the conclusion that HFCS is the greatest nonlethal invention of this earth, it is a story full of sorrow and joy, memories and exploding futures. It’s also pretty brief.
It all started when I was thirsty. Despite my ongoing attempts to stamp out humanities four main drives (hunger, thirst, lust, growing facial hair) I still occasionally succumb to these reprehensible states. And what, in my thirst, a time of great need and terror, was the only available drink? A Snapple peach iced tea. Now, anybody who gives any mind to the Gource (and God knows you should) knows that I hate tea. But here is what I found as I consumed the Snapple: it was wholly tolerable. Why was this? Because the drink is chock full of HFCS goodness.
Time for some extrapolation. If high fructose corn syrup can make a bad thing tolerable, then it can probably make an already good thing excellent. Take it one step further: a thing that is already excellent can be made divine. Some examples: lobster with HFCS, veal with HFCS, firearms with HFCS bullets, robots powered by HFCS, etc.
I know what a lot of people are probably thinking: “wow Guiles, these ideas are so, so good.” Thank you. Now, I also know what an insignificant few of you are thinking: “won’t putting more HFCS in everything exacerbate America’s growing obesity problem, and won’t incidences of diabetes continue to rise?”
Simply put: no. America doesn’t have an obesity problem; America has a fat children problem. Kids these days are fatter than kids of the past, and they keep growing up into fat teenagers and fat adults. Occasionally these fat adults reproduce, like whales, resulting in thousands of sticky eggs full of fat children that somehow find their way to the ceilings and doors of fast food restaurants across this great nation. The cycle is both terrifying and hideous. As far as diabetes is concerned, I’m all for it making a serious comeback. This might seem confusing to you, but I’ve got my reasons, some of which might involve a desire to see Wilford Brimley back in the spotlight, where he belongs.

Thursday, November 16, 2006

Hey, Stupid - Do You Want a T-Shirt?

The Grimary Gource is currently offering some fantastic t-shirts available for purchase. They look like this:











































If you want to buy one, send an e-mail to gource.gurchases@gmail.com, and maybe we'll consider it. Specify size and sex. T-shirts cost $20, and if you want us to put your ugly mug on the front, that'll be another $5. Order today and receive the t-shirt you ordered.

G.E.M.S. - Isn't it Time They Got a Life?

It has recently been brought to the attention of the Gufts Campus, that G.E.M.S., the Gufts Emergency Medical Service, has been socially flat lining. Our erstwhile partiers, who would host the oxygen bar in the ranks of South Hall formerly dubbed the "red light" district, have become to dedicated to their duty. Their universal fobs used to grant us access into any party that could leave you comatose. The G.E.M.S. truck, used to be the love shack, where you didn't need an automated electronic defibrillator to get your heart pumping (if you know what I mean). CPR "Jane" and "Bob" were accused of not having a heart, but they did provide some hot synthetic action for several lonely Guftonians.
Alas, the party paramedics, no longer breathe the social life back into the Gufts campus. Who would have thought that altruism would come to lay low our noble nebulizers? It has been testified, that in the former red light district, the G.E.M.S. were running CPR drills. They must at all times be ready to save a Gufts student from sniffing too much of someone else's Aderol. The Gufts community must truly be thankful, for who else would rescue our roommates from a Natty Light Coma at a quarter to two on a Monday Night in Goddard Chapel? The truck can now be seen mourning in front of Barnum, waiting for a chemical experiment to go terribly wrong. On Thursdays they can also be seen outside the philosophy building, where Gorgias followers, who deny their existence, and fatalists who think that they only slow down the process repeatedly ignore them.
Needless to say, no longer will we see the blood pressure cuff being used as a means for autoerotic asphyxiation. Our prank calls of mortal peril or fratricide, will no longer be taken with a grain of salt. This new squad is more bile-provoking than syrup of ipecac. I for one will no longer be swallowing Clorox in order to get the life of the party to my 20.

Wednesday, November 15, 2006

Roman Numerals – Do They Mean Anything?

Recently, there has been a movement among so-called “intellectuals” and “blue-collar workers” to integrate roman numerals into normal math and lists. Rather than using our time-honored Anglo numerals (1, 2, 3, 15, etc.), these topheavies want us to rely on using letters instead, apparently just leaving all our good numbers to waste away at the top of our American keyboards.
We must remember that the Romans were the same society that invented sodomy, bestiality, alcohol, and fraternities—all of their contributions to world society have been viciously harmful and largely blundering. Why have we not yet recognized the potentially harmful Roman influence on our American society through their numerals, essentially a theft of letters that previously meant things. MIX means mix, not 1,009. This should be obvious.
This extends to movie sequels, by the way. Like every other human being on earth, I tend to like sequels more than originals, but I am sick and tired of seeing a movie with a title like “Rocky V,” which always makes me wonder if the protagonist has changed his last name to Valboa. Give me The Santa Clause 3 over this unAmerican tripe, every time.

Tape - Do We Still Use This Stuff?

Tape is nearly ubiquitous around a college campus. I am not referring to video or audiotape, both of which went out with Jeff Goldblum and the dinosaurs. Rather, I refer to strips of adhesive used for mending and other activities almost certain to frustrate a skilled craftsman with exacting demands (like myself, or Frank Gehry).
Tape never works. In a recent study done by an unbiased survey company, Consumer Advocates Against Tape, 76% of adhesive tape goes unsticky after twenty-five minutes, and the other 14% was never purchased. It is wise consumers like myself and Ralph Nader who know to avoid tape when putting this back together. There is only one thing that can genuinely get the job done, 100% of the time: Staples.
It is only idiots who cannot properly use staples, and you can tell who they are by the vampire bite-like holes in their thumbs where they got overzealous with a machine clearly too sophisticated for their Rice Krispies-like brains. These are the same Greenstreets who end up severing the top corner of their papers, simply because they are too bumblingly awkward to use staples to keep several pieces of paper in order.
Think about it: staples never die, they cannot rust, and they are unbreakable by all but Samuel L. Jackson. Realistically, there is no reason to use anything but staples to put things back together. This includes marriages.